Key Takeaways
- 24 buildings, 9,313 homes and 1,525 qualified sales — all from the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser record, not asking prices.
- Eleven buildings rose and eleven fell over four years — there is no single “Miami condo market” direction.
- Turnover ranges from one home in 16 per year to one in 62 — nearly a fourfold difference in how easily you can sell.
- 1010 Brickell is the strongest, up 9.1% per square foot — and it rose in every single year, on 76 sales.
- The Mark on Brickell is the weakest, down 28.9% — falling every year, accelerating, with a record sale from 2014.
- Median sale price is misleading in most buildings — Brickell House looks down 34.6% and is actually up 2.7% per square foot.
What this index is, and why it exists
Almost every condo statistic published about Miami comes from asking prices, from a brokerage’s own listings, or from a portal repackaging both. Asking prices tell you what sellers hope for. They are not evidence.
This index uses one source and one source only: the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser record. Every folio in every building below was retrieved individually, filtered to residential homes, and reduced to qualified, arm’s-length sales — the county’s own designation for a genuine open-market transaction between unrelated parties.
As of 18 August 2026 that is 24 buildings, 9,313 homes and 1,525 qualified sales across four years.
It is public record, so you can check every figure yourself. It is also the reason this page can say things no marketing site will: several of these buildings have lost a fifth to a quarter of their value per square foot, and I have named them.
The index — ranked by how often homes actually trade
Sorted by annual turnover, most liquid first. Turnover is the number most buyers never look at and the one that decides whether you can sell.
| Building | Area | Homes | Median sq ft | Median assessed 2026 | Qualified sales 2023–26 | Annual turnover | $/sq ft 2026 | 4-year change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Crimson | Edgewater | 90 | 1,154 | $468,544 | 23 | 1 in 16 | $617 | -0.3% |
| The Club at Brickell Bay | Brickell | 643 | 825 | $353,775 | 132 | 1 in 19 | $552 | -20.8% |
| 900 Biscayne Bay | Downtown | 508 | 1,450 | $640,393 | 108 | 1 in 19 | $744 | +5.4% |
| 1010 Brickell | Brickell | 387 | 1,283 | $654,397 | 76 | 1 in 20 | $872 | +9.1% |
| Canvas | Edgewater | 513 | 857 | $389,313 | 105 | 1 in 20 | $506 | -10.4% |
| Quantum on the Bay South | Edgewater | 452 | 838 | $353,710 | 86 | 1 in 21 | $504 | -7.9% |
| Infinity at Brickell | Brickell | 459 | 785 | $337,727 | 86 | 1 in 21 | $581 | +2.5% |
| Aria on the Bay | Edgewater | 648 | 1,079 | $568,436 | 120 | 1 in 22 | $689 | +1.3% |
| Brickell House | Brickell | 374 | 716 | $455,704 | 67 | 1 in 22 | $868 | +2.7% |
| Mint | Miami River | 527 | 1,118 | $477,850 | 93 | 1 in 23 | $548 | +3.0% |
| Wind by NEO | Brickell | 489 | 920 | $317,093 | 80 | 1 in 24 | $451 | -14.4% |
| Skyline on Brickell | Brickell | 360 | 791 | $407,506 | 60 | 1 in 24 | $640 | +3.9% |
| 1800 Club | Edgewater | 469 | 1,144 | $438,316 | 77 | 1 in 24 | $475 | -10.7% |
| Marina Blue | Downtown | 514 | 1,198 | $484,538 | 68 | 1 in 30 | $639 | +4.9% |
| Quantum on the Bay North | Edgewater | 239 | 1,084 | $396,122 | 31 | 1 in 31 | $519 | -9.1% |
| The Mark on Brickell | Brickell | 359 | 1,140 | $446,117 | 47 | 1 in 31 | $467 | -28.9% |
| 1100 Millecento | Brickell | 382 | 910 | $431,159 | 50 | 1 in 31 | $611 | +0.0% |
| Porto Vita South Tower | Aventura | 150 | 2,890 | $1,382,036 | 19 | 1 in 32 | $815 | +8.2% |
| The Waves | Surfside | 106 | 1,510 | $744,145 | 13 | 1 in 33 | $686 | +4.1% |
| The Peninsula | Aventura | 222 | 3,078 | $1,155,325 | 26 | 1 in 34 | $531 | -1.5% |
| Ocean Reserve | Sunny Isles | 398 | 1,005 | $308,577 | 47 | 1 in 34 | $381 | -20.6% |
| Latitude on the River | Miami River | 452 | 899 | $352,158 | 51 | 1 in 35 | $488 | +1.5% |
| Harbour House | Bal Harbour | 449 | 896 | $658,717 | 52 | 1 in 35 | $915 | -11.2% |
| Porto Vita North Tower | Aventura | 123 | 3,385 | $2,012,296 | 8 | 1 in 62 | $762 | — |
Median assessed value is the 2026 tax roll. $/sq ft is the median of qualified sales in 2026, or 2025 where 2026 has none. Four-year change compares 2026 against 2023. Buildings the county records as separate condominiums — Porto Vita and Quantum on the Bay — are listed as separate towers because their numbers genuinely differ.
Turnover is the number that decides whether you can sell
The spread here is enormous. The Crimson turns over roughly one home in sixteen every year. Porto Vita’s North Tower turns over about one in sixty-two — nearly four times slower.
In practice that is the difference between an exit that takes weeks and one that takes seasons. It also decides whether you can price with confidence: in a building trading twenty homes a year there is always a current comparable, and in one trading two there is not.
Five buildings here trade at one home in twenty-two or better — The Crimson, 1010 Brickell, Canvas, Quantum South, Infinity at Brickell, Aria on the Bay and Brickell House. If liquidity matters to you, that is your shortlist, and it has almost nothing to do with which buildings are marketed hardest.
Eleven up, eleven down, and the gap between them is wide
Of the twenty-two buildings with a full four-year record, eleven rose and eleven fell. Anyone telling you “the Miami condo market” is doing one thing is not looking at buildings.
The strongest: 1010 Brickell, up 9.1% per square foot, and it rose in every single year — on 76 sales, so it is well evidenced. Porto Vita’s South Tower is up 8.2%, though on only 19 sales.
The weakest: The Mark on Brickell, down 28.9% — falling every year, accelerating, and its record sale is from 2014. Ocean Reserve is down 20.6% on 47 sales, which makes it one of the better-evidenced declines in the set. Wind by NEO is down 14.4% and the fall is steepening.
Two buildings barely moved at all: 1100 Millecento ended exactly where it started, and Aria on the Bay moved 1.3% across 120 sales — the most heavily evidenced stability in the index.
The trap: why median sale price lies
If you take one thing from this page, take this. In a building with varied floorplates, the median sale price is close to meaningless, and it is the number most often quoted.
Three examples from this index, all real:
- Brickell House. Median sale price down 34.6%. Price per square foot up 2.7%. The building spans 355 to 6,902 square feet — a factor of nineteen — so the median tracks which homes sold, not what they are worth.
- Infinity at Brickell. Median down 21.8%, per square foot up 2.3%, on 86 sales.
- Skyline on Brickell. Median sale price up 78.6%. Actual value per square foot: up 3.9%. Seven in eight homes there are one of two sizes, so whichever tier trades sets the headline.
The reverse also happens. At Wind by NEO the median price rose in 2026 while price per foot fell 9.8% — slightly larger homes sold. A reader watching the median would have concluded the market turned. It did not.
Ask for the per-square-foot figure, every time. Where a building’s homes are nearly identical — Ocean Reserve, where 276 of 398 homes are the same 1,005 square feet — the two measures converge and the median becomes trustworthy again.
How to use this
If you are buying, start with turnover, then per-foot direction, then size. A building that trades freely at a stable per-foot price is a materially safer purchase than one that trades twice a year at a headline number nobody can verify.
If you are selling, find your building above and price against its per-foot column, not against the last big sale. In several of these buildings the last big sale is a different floorplate from yours and hundreds of thousands of dollars away from being a fair guide.
If a figure here disagrees with something you have been told, the county record is public and I have named the source. Check it.
This index will grow. Each building links to its own page, where the full year-by-year record, the size and bedroom mix, and the caveats specific to that building are set out in detail.
Verified 18 August 2026 against the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser record. Every folio in all 24 buildings was retrieved individually, grouped by county subdivision, and filtered to residential homes — excluding commercial units, parking, cabana, locker and storage folios. Sale figures are qualified, arm’s-length transactions only, with bulk and portfolio transfers — which the county records against every folio in the deal at the full transaction price — collapsed to a single transaction, and county-flagged multi-parcel sales excluded outright. 2026 is an incomplete year throughout. Building ages, storey counts and amenity details are omitted: no primary source has been confirmed for them. Re-check when the next tax roll publishes.
The Miami Condo Index — Frequently Asked Questions
Where does the data in this index come from?
Entirely from the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser, the public tax and transaction record. Every folio in each building was retrieved individually and reduced to qualified, arm’s-length sales — the county’s own designation for a genuine open-market transaction between unrelated parties. No asking prices, no listing data, no aggregator figures.
Why rank by turnover instead of price?
Because turnover decides whether you can act. A building trading one home in sixteen each year gives you current comparables and a realistic exit. One trading one in sixty-two gives you neither, however attractive the price looks. It is the number buyers most often overlook and the one that most affects the outcome.
Is the Miami condo market going up or down?
Both, depending on the building. Of the eighteen buildings here with a full four-year record, eleven rose and eleven fell. The spread runs from 1010 Brickell up 9.1% to The Mark on Brickell down 28.9%. Any single claim about “the Miami condo market” hides that range.
Why do you use price per square foot instead of median sale price?
Because in a building with varied floorplates the median sale price mostly reports which homes happened to sell that year. Brickell House shows a 34.6% fall in median price and a 2.7% rise per square foot over the same 67 transactions, because its homes range from 355 to 6,902 square feet. The per-square-foot figure is the like-for-like measure.
Which building has held its value best?
1010 Brickell rose in all four years measured, up 9.1% per square foot on 76 qualified sales. For stability rather than growth, Aria on the Bay moved just 1.3% across 120 sales — the most heavily evidenced flat trend in the index.
Which buildings should I be careful about?
On this record, The Mark on Brickell has fallen 28.9% per square foot with the decline accelerating and its record sale dating from 2014. Ocean Reserve is down 20.6%, and Wind by NEO 14.4% with the fall steepening. These are statements about the public transaction record, not predictions.
How often is this index updated?
It is re-checked when the county publishes a new tax roll, and each building page carries its own verification date. The index will also expand: more buildings are being added to the same standard.
Sources and further reading
Start here
The main sections of The Miami Confidential.

