Building facts
- Address
- 3651 Collins Avenue
- Neighborhood
- Miami Beach
- Year built
- 2015
- Floors
- 10
- Residences
- 8
- Status
- Completed
- Developer
- Ugo Colombo, Valerio Morabito
- Architect
- Bernardo Fort-Brescia
- Pricing
- Starting at
Verified 21 August 2026Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser1 source

Key Takeaways
- Four of the seven homes have a complete round trip on record — and they range from −20.0% to +32.8% — on near-identical apartments.
- Five homes sold within six weeks of each other in 2016 — at $5,625,000, $5,760,800, $6,400,000, $7,500,000 and $7,500,000 — a 33% spread at launch on homes within eleven square feet of one another.
- One home is worth less today than in 2016 — $7,500,000 in May 2016, $7,400,000 in November 2025 — nine and a half years for −1.3%.
- Another gained 32.8% over ten years — $5,760,800 in June 2016 to $7,650,000 in May 2026.
- There are seven homes in total — five four-bedrooms of about 3,410 square feet, one 4,642 square foot five-bedroom and one 6,678 square foot seven-bedroom.
- The highest price recorded is $14,000,000 — in May 2016 — $3,016 per square foot, and nothing since has come near it.
Beach House 8, by the numbers
Developer: Ugo Colombo, Valerio Morabito · Architect: Bernardo Fort-Brescia · Starting at. Source: the building record on this site.
3651 Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33140 | Neighborhood: Miami Beach
What is actually inside the building
The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser holds seven folios at 3651 Collins Avenue, and every one is a residence. The declaration’s common-element shares close, so this is the entire condominium.

Seven homes. Almost all of them are the same home: five four-bedrooms of 3,403, 3,405, 3,410, 3,413 and 3,414 square feet — eleven square feet separates the smallest from the largest. The other two are a 4,642 square foot five-bedroom and a 6,678 square foot seven-bedroom.
That uniformity is what makes this page unusual. In most buildings I have to warn that comparing sales across different-sized homes is unreliable. Here, five of the seven are effectively the same apartment, so the county record can be read almost as a controlled experiment.
The 2026 assessed values run $5,462,500 to $13,029,500, with a median of $5,954,100.
Five near-identical homes, five different prices
The building sold in 2016, and the original closings are the first thing worth seeing. All five of the ~3,410 square foot four-bedrooms traded between 23 May and 6 July 2016 — a six-week window:

| Home | Date | Price | $/sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3,410 sq ft | 23 May 2016 | $7,500,000 | $2,199 |
| 3,414 sq ft | 6 June 2016 | $5,760,800 | $1,687 |
| 3,403 sq ft | 15 June 2016 | $6,400,000 | $1,881 |
| 3,405 sq ft | 24 June 2016 | $7,500,000 | $2,203 |
| 3,413 sq ft | 6 July 2016 | $5,625,000 | $1,648 |
Homes within eleven square feet of one another, sold within six weeks of one another, at prices ranging from $5,625,000 to $7,500,000 — a spread of 33.3%.
The county record shows what was paid, not why, so I cannot tell you whether that reflects floor, exposure, finish level, or simply what each buyer agreed to. What it does establish is that two buyers paid $1,875,000 more than two others for essentially the same apartment in the same summer — and, as the next section shows, that starting price determined almost everything about how they did afterwards.
What happened to the people who bought in 2016
Four of the seven homes have since recorded a second qualified sale. Both legs of each of these is a qualified, arm’s-length transaction above a nominal amount — nominal transfers and one sale the county declines to qualify are excluded rather than filtered by price.
| Home | Bought | Sold | Held | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,414 sq ft | $5,760,800 — Jun 2016 | $7,650,000 — May 2026 | 10 years | +32.8% |
| 3,413 sq ft | $5,625,000 — Jul 2016 | $7,200,000 — May 2018 | 1 yr 10 mo | +28.0% |
| 3,410 sq ft | $7,500,000 — May 2016 | $7,400,000 — Nov 2025 | 9 yr 6 mo | −1.3% |
| 3,405 sq ft | $7,500,000 — Jun 2016 | $6,000,000 — May 2021 | 4 yr 11 mo | −20.0% |
The pattern is almost perfectly ordered by what each buyer paid at the start. The two who bought at $5,625,000 and $5,760,800 are up 28.0% and 32.8%. The two who paid $7,500,000 are down 1.3% and 20.0%.
The $7,500,000 buyer of June 2016 had an intermediate step worth noting: the home resold at $6,581,400 in August 2017 — down 12.2% in fourteen months — before the 2021 sale at $6,000,000.
Every one of these homes is within eleven square feet of every other. There is no size explanation, no floorplan explanation and no market-timing explanation that separates them, because they were all bought in the same six weeks. What separated the outcomes was the entry price.
I want to state the limit honestly: this is four transactions in a seven-home building, and the county record does not tell you the condition of any home at either sale or what each deed included. But four of seven is a majority of the building, the homes really are alike, and the ordering is hard to dismiss.
The highest price ever recorded here is $14,000,000, on 27 May 2016, for the 4,642 square foot five-bedroom — $3,016 per square foot. A later transaction on that home is recorded at a higher figure but the county does not flag it as a qualified sale, so it is excluded from every comparison on this page. Nothing qualified since 2016 has approached $3,016 per square foot; the most recent sale in the building, in May 2026, cleared at $2,241.
Note also what is absent: no qualified sales at all in 2023 or 2024. The building produced one in 2025 and one in 2026.
Who this building suits
It suits a buyer who wants a 3,400 square foot oceanfront four-bedroom in a building with six neighbours. That is a genuinely rare product, and the near-identical layouts mean you can price a purchase against four recorded round trips of the same apartment — which is more direct evidence than most buyers of a $7,000,000 home ever get.
The lesson the record teaches is about entry price, and it is unusually clear. In this building, what you pay going in has determined the outcome more than how long you held: a buyer at $5.7 million made 32.8% over ten years while a buyer at $7.5 million lost 20.0% over five. Negotiate hard, and treat the 2016 launch prices as evidence rather than as a benchmark.
It suits anyone needing liquidity badly. Two qualified sales in four years, none at all in 2023 or 2024, in a seven-home building. If you need to sell on a timetable, this is close to no market — and if a second owner lists at the same time, you are competing directly with them.
Weigh the association carefully. Seven owners share every cost here. A special assessment, an insurance renewal or a structural reserve requirement divides seven ways, and one owner falling behind is over fourteen per cent of the budget. Ask for the reserve study and the last three years of accounts before anything else.
If you are selling here, your comparables are the November 2025 sale at $7,400,000 and the May 2026 sale at $7,650,000 — both near-identical to most of the building, and both usable. Price against those rather than against 2016. Ask me before you set a number.
Beach House 8 — Frequently Asked Questions
How many homes are there at Beach House 8?
Seven. Five are four-bedrooms of between 3,403 and 3,414 square feet — eleven square feet separates them — plus one 4,642 square foot five-bedroom and one 6,678 square foot seven-bedroom. The declaration closes on those seven, so that is the whole building.
Have buyers at Beach House 8 made money?
It has depended almost entirely on what they paid in 2016. Four homes have a complete round trip on record: the two bought at $5,625,000 and $5,760,800 are up 28.0% and 32.8%, while the two bought at $7,500,000 are down 1.3% and 20.0%. All four homes are within eleven square feet of each other.
Why did five identical homes sell at such different prices in 2016?
The county record shows what was paid, not why. Between 23 May and 6 July 2016 the five ~3,410 square foot homes traded at $5,625,000, $5,760,800, $6,400,000, $7,500,000 and $7,500,000 — a spread of 33.3% inside six weeks. Floor, exposure and finish level could all be contributing; none of that is in the tax roll.
What is the most expensive sale at Beach House 8?
$14,000,000 on 27 May 2016, for the 4,642 square foot five-bedroom — $3,016 per square foot. A later transaction on that home is recorded at a higher figure but the county does not flag it as a qualified sale, so it is excluded here. No qualified sale since 2016 has come close to $3,016 per square foot; the most recent, in May 2026, cleared at $2,241.
How often do homes at Beach House 8 sell?
Very rarely. Two qualified sales across 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 to date — none at all in 2023 or 2024 — in a seven-home building. If you need to sell on a timetable this is effectively no market.
What should I check before buying at Beach House 8?
The reserve study and the last three years of association accounts. Seven owners share every cost, so a special assessment or insurance renewal divides seven ways and one owner falling behind is over fourteen per cent of the budget. And negotiate the entry price hard — in this building it has mattered more than holding period.
Sources and further reading
Interested in selling at Beach House 8?
Learn more about selling your condo at Beach House 8 with Josh Stein.
Thinking about Beach House 8?
I have sold South Florida property since 2002, more than $1 billion of it. Ask me for the recorded declaration, what has genuinely closed, or a straight answer on whether this building fits what you are after.
Josh Stein · Florida real estate sales associate, license SL3057661 · (305) 695-8257 · hello@joshsteinrealtor.comRelated coverage
Part of Miami Luxury Condos.

