6000 Indian Creek

What is actually in the building

The county returns 38 folios for 6000 Indian Creek Drive, and classifies all of them as residential. Thirty-seven are homes.

The floorplan structure is about as simple as it gets. Thirty-two homes measure exactly 1,300 sq ft and five measure exactly 2,600 — the same plan, and the same plan doubled. The bedroom mix follows: 33 two-bedrooms, three three-bedrooms and one four-bedroom.

The remaining folio needs naming. Unit CU-1 is 560 sq ft and the county assesses it at $100 — not $100,000, one hundred dollars — and has done for 2024, 2025 and 2026. Every other home here is assessed between $404,825 and $1,703,890, median $703,059. I am not going to speculate about why that folio carries the value it does. It is excluded from every figure on this page, and it is disclosed here because a naive average of this building’s assessments is meaningless with it in.

Why has this building been so hard on its owners?

I do not know why, and the county record cannot tell me. What it can tell me is how it has gone for sellers, and the answer is: badly.

The county records 49 resales at this address, counting every resale including 8 where a foreclosure fell between the two sales. Twenty-six of them, 53.1%, sold for less than the seller paid. The median outcome across all 49 was −3.1%, over a median hold of 5.3 years. Leaving out the 8 foreclosure-broken chains, 19 of the remaining 41 (46.3%) sold below the prior price. Among the 26 losses, the median was 24.7% and the worst was 64.4%.

The shape of it is not mysterious, even if the cause is. The building sold through in 2006 — 32 homes, the whole of the main floorplate, at a median $661,500, or $479 per square foot. That is a cyclical peak, and buyers at a cyclical peak in Miami have generally done badly; I have measured the same effect at several 2005–2008 sell-outs.

What distinguishes this one is that the recovery never really arrived. Twenty years after that sell-out, the last three qualified sales here cleared $723, $788 and $769 per square foot. Against $479 in 2006 that is a gain of roughly 60% across two decades — before costs, and before considering that many owners sold in the years between, when the number was lower.

Set against the rest of this series, that is a poor result. Buildings that sold out in the same era have shown median resale gains of 25% to 47% over holds of four to five years; this one shows −3.1% over a 5.3-year hold. And unlike most of them, it has not had a strong recent run to compensate: the building has recorded three qualified sales in four years.

The honest framing for a buyer today is that this is a cheap entry into a beachside address with a bad history and very little liquidity. Whether that is an opportunity depends entirely on why the history is bad — and that is a question the public record does not answer. Anyone considering a purchase here should be asking about the building itself, its reserves and its assessments, rather than reading the price record and assuming a bargain.

The price record

Two of the four years recorded no qualified sales at all. No four-year change is published for this building and it carries a dash in my Miami Condo Index — there is nothing to compare a 2026 figure against.

Across the three sales the building cleared a median $769 per square foot, in a band from $723 to $788, at a median price of $1,000,000. That band is narrow because all three sales were the same 1,300 sq ft floorplan, which is the one advantage of a building with essentially one home in it: the few comparables that exist are directly comparable.

Liquidity is severe. Three sales against 37 homes is about one home in 49 a year, against a median of one in 23 across the buildings in my Miami Condo Index.

The record is $1,847,500, paid on 13 April 2021 for one of the five 2,600 sq ft homes — $711 per square foot. Note that the record price per square foot is lower than the last three ordinary sales: the larger homes here trade at less money per foot, which is the usual pattern.

Who this building suits, and who it does not

It suits a buyer who wants a lower per-foot price at a beachside Miami Beach address, and who is buying the home rather than the investment case. At $746 per square foot on 2026 sales, this building is cheaper than 69 of the 116 other buildings on the Miami Condo Index; the three recent sales on 1,300 sq ft two-bedrooms ran $723 to $788.

It suits a buyer prepared to do building-level due diligence properly — financials, reserves, assessment history, litigation — because the price record raises questions that the price record cannot answer.

It suits badly anyone who needs liquidity or a valuation anchor. Two of the last four years produced no sales at all.

It suits badly a buyer expecting the location to carry the investment. Fifty-three percent of resales here sold below the prior price (every resale, including foreclosure chains), and the worst loss was 64.4%.

If you are selling here, the good news is that the three recent sales are all the same floorplan as yours and they are tightly grouped: $723, $769 and $788 per square foot. That is a clearer comparable set than most buildings on the beach can offer. The hard part is that there are only three of them across four years, and a buyer who has looked at the resale history will know that more than half of your predecessors sold at a loss. Price to the recent three, be prepared to wait, and do not expect the 2021 record of $1,847,500 — a much larger home, five years ago — to help you.

How this building compares: the Miami Condo Index ranks buildings by price per square foot and four-year change from the county record, the Miami Resale Record shows how often resales closed below the seller’s price, and the 100 Latest Sales list shows MLS closings as they post. Every building we cover is on the Miami Luxury Condos page.

Interested in selling in 6000 Indian Creek?

Learn more about selling your condo in 6000 Indian Creek with Josh Stein.

I'M READY