Miami Real EstateThe MIAMI
Confidential
Case files · 21 September 2026
Latest File · Brickell & Brickell KeyBrickell unit counts: three towers, published figures comparedThis file needs no developer’s cooperation and makes no accusation. It is three towers, three sets of numbers …Open the files →
Josh Stein, Miami real estate associateJosh Stein

When a condo becomes a hotel: what is happening inside two Brickell towers

At The Club at Brickell Bay, July 2026 press reports, including the Tampa Bay Times (28 July 2026), put the share of condominiums rented to tourists on Airbnb and similar platforms at 85%. A few blocks away, CBS News Miami reported that more than thirty owner families are suing their own board over a similar dispute.

Two Brickell buildings — what has been reported, as of 5 August 2026

The Club at Brickell Bay
85% of condos reported rented to tourists on Airbnb and other platforms
Reported timeline
Coverage through July 2026; one documented incident dated 30 March 2026
The Club’s board — response
None published. The Miami Herald reported that the board president and the association’s attorney did not respond to its requests for comment.
Brickell on the River South
30+ owner families suing their own condominium board
What is alleged there
Board allowed illegal short-term rentals, turning the building “hotel-like”
Regulations cited in that suit
Miami-Dade County rules and the Miami 21 zoning code
Brickell on the River South board — response
Allegations are “inaccurate, inflammatory, and legally unsound”
Board’s stated term
Began 21 November 2024; says some incidents predate it
The enforcement question
Raised publicly: whether the city enforced its own rules

Reported by the Tampa Bay Times (28 July 2026), CBS News Miami, The Real Deal (16 July 2026) and a Miami Herald opinion piece. All claims below are allegations reported by those outlets, not findings of fact, and no court has ruled. Verified 5 August 2026. Updated 9 September 2026 with the City of Miami’s 11 August 2026 cease-and-desist and the association’s non-response, per The Real Deal (14 August 2026) and WLRN (28 August 2026).

What the 85% figure means

Reporting on The Club at Brickell Bay puts the share of units rented to tourists on short-term platforms at 85%. Residents described to reporters a documentary trail of complaints — “email chains as tangled as a bowlful of spaghetti as proof of their exasperating attempts to get somebody to do something.” One documented incident has partygoers returning at 4 a.m. on 30 March 2026.

Fines for short-term rental violations dropped after 2018, making Airbnb hosting slightly easier in eligible buildings, explained in Miami condos that allow short-term rentals.

An ownership concentration at that level is structurally significant. In a normal condominium, short-term rental operators are a minority the association can regulate. At a high enough concentration, the owners who rent short-term can also hold enough votes to shape the board and the rules that would govern them, which can leave resident owners with fewer options inside the building’s own governance process.

It is not one building

At Brickell on the River South, CBS News Miami reported that more than 30 condo owner families are suing their condominium board, accusing board members of “allowing illegal short-term rentals, which they say have turned their upscale building into a hotel-like environment.”

The reported complaint describes a woman kicking in a door, disturbances in common areas, Airbnb listings, strangers entering the building, loud parties and a decline in security enforcement — alongside claims of alleged sexual activity in the community pool and a security guard found asleep on duty. The suit reportedly cites violations of Miami-Dade County regulations and breaches of the Miami 21 zoning code.

The board rejects it. Its stated position is that the allegations are “inaccurate, inflammatory, and legally unsound.” The board notes that its current term began 21 November 2024, says it has “taken proactive and consistent action to address unlawful short-term rentals,” and states that some incidents either predate its tenure or have been mischaracterised.

No court has ruled on any of this. These are allegations on one side and a denial on the other, and this page is not going to pretend otherwise.

Why this is a buyer’s problem, not a gossip item

A building that operates as an unofficial hotel carries costs that show up in ways a listing never mentions.

Wear and common-element expense. Transient occupancy at volume destroys lobbies, lifts, corridors and amenity decks far faster than residential use. Somebody funds that, and it is the owners, through assessments.

Insurance. Claims history and occupancy profile drive premiums and deductibles. This matters more than it used to: since 1 July 2026, a master property policy with a deductible above $50,000 per unit makes a project ineligible under Fannie Mae’s rules. A building with a bad loss history has a direct route to that ceiling.

Reserves and the milestone calendar. Heavier use accelerates the wear that a structural integrity reserve study has to fund. From 4 January 2027, minimum reserves rise from 10% to 15% of annual budgeted assessment income.

And the exit. Since 3 August 2026, established projects face a Full Review at every down-payment level. Litigation, deferred maintenance, thin reserves and insurance problems are precisely what a Full Review examines. 48.5% of Miami-Dade condominium sales closed in cash in June 2026 — meaning 51.5% needed a lender. A building that cannot clear review loses roughly half its buyer pool, into a market already carrying 12.3 months of condominium supply.

That is the mechanism by which a governance problem becomes a pricing problem. It is not fast and it is not visible on a viewing.

One thing genuinely changed in 2026 — and it cuts the other way

Fannie Mae’s Lender Letter LL-2026-03 retired the 50% investor-concentration limit for established projects reviewed under the Full Review option, effective immediately. Under the old rule, a building where most units were investor-owned could fail on that basis alone.

So a building like The Club at Brickell Bay is less likely to be disqualified purely for its ownership mix than it was a year ago. That is a liquidity improvement and it is real. But it removes one test, not the test. Litigation, reserves, insurance and deferred maintenance all remain squarely in scope — and those are the things a transient-use building tends to struggle with.

How to check this before you buy, in an afternoon

Every one of these is answerable from documents and public sources before you go under contract.

  1. Search the building’s own address on the short-term rental platforms. Count the active listings. This takes ten minutes and it is the single most informative thing you can do. If the count is a meaningful share of the unit count, you have your answer regardless of what the declaration says.
  2. Read the declaration and rules on leasing — minimum term, approval requirement, leasing cap, waiting period after purchase. Then ask when they were last amended, and by what margin.
  3. Ask for the litigation disclosure. Pending suits involving the association are disclosable and they are a direct Full Review issue.
  4. Read three years of board minutes, not just the budget. Governance conflict shows up there long before it reaches a courtroom or a newspaper.
  5. Get the master policy and its per-unit deductible, against the $50,000 ceiling in force since 1 July 2026.
  6. Get the reserve position against the 15% standard arriving 4 January 2027, plus the structural integrity reserve study and the milestone inspection year.
  7. Ask the front desk what a normal Friday night looks like. It is not a document, and it is frequently the most honest source in the building.

And the broader rule, which applies across this market: the short-term rental rules differ enormously by jurisdiction — Miami Beach counts anything under six months and one day as short-term and prohibits it outright in every single-family home, while unincorporated Miami-Dade uses a thirty-day definition. Municipal permission and association permission are two separate questions, and you need both.

What I would tell a buyer looking at Brickell right now

Brickell is not broken, and this is not an argument against it. It is an argument for reading the building rather than the brochure. Brickell contains some of the best-run towers in Miami and some of the worst, and from the street on a Tuesday afternoon they look identical.

The buildings in the reporting above are in public conflict. Most are not. But the conditions that produced these situations — high investor concentration, weak enforcement, an association that either cannot or will not act — exist quietly in other towers, and they are visible in the documents long before they are visible in the lobby.

Tell me which building you are considering and I will tell you what its documents actually say — including when the answer is that you should walk away.

Short-term rentals in Brickell condominiums — common questions

What is happening at The Club at Brickell Bay?

Reporting in July 2026 put the share of units rented to tourists on Airbnb and similar platforms at 85%, with residents describing prolonged and unsuccessful attempts to get the situation addressed, and one documented incident of partygoers returning at 4 a.m. on 30 March 2026. These are reported allegations and characterisations, not findings of fact.

Why does an 85% short-term rental share matter so much?

An ownership concentration at that level is structurally significant. In a normal condominium, short-term operators are a minority the association regulates. At a high enough concentration, the owners who rent short-term can also hold enough votes to shape the board and the rules that would govern them, which can leave resident owners with fewer options inside the building’s own governance process.

Is this happening in other Brickell buildings?

At least one other. CBS News Miami reported that more than 30 condo owner families at Brickell on the River South are suing their condominium board, alleging it allowed illegal short-term rentals that turned the building “hotel-like”, and citing Miami-Dade regulations and the Miami 21 zoning code. The board rejects the claims as “inaccurate, inflammatory, and legally unsound”, notes its term began 21 November 2024, and says it has taken proactive action. No court has ruled.

How does this affect the value of a unit in such a building?

Through financing and carrying costs rather than through reputation. Transient use accelerates wear on common elements, which owners fund through assessments; it affects claims history and therefore insurance, where a master policy deductible above $50,000 per unit has broken Fannie Mae eligibility since 1 July 2026; and it strains reserves against the 15% minimum arriving 4 January 2027. Since 3 August 2026 established projects face a Full Review at every down-payment level, and litigation, thin reserves and insurance problems are exactly what that examines.

Did the 2026 rule changes make this better or worse for investor-heavy buildings?

Both. Fannie Mae retired the 50% investor-concentration limit for established projects under Full Review, effective immediately — so a building is no longer disqualified purely for its ownership mix, which is a genuine liquidity improvement. But that removed one test, not the test. Litigation, reserves, insurance and deferred maintenance remain in scope, and those are precisely where transient-use buildings tend to struggle.

How do I check a building before buying?

Search the building’s address on the short-term rental platforms and count active listings — ten minutes, and the most informative thing you can do. Then read the declaration’s leasing provisions and when they were last amended, the litigation disclosure, three years of board minutes, the master policy and its per-unit deductible, and the reserve position plus the structural integrity reserve study and milestone year. Then ask the front desk what a normal Friday night is like.

Sources and further reading

Direct line

Ask Josh a question

Tell me the building, the budget and the timeline. You will get an honest read — including when the answer is that you should not buy it.

+1 (305) 695-8257 · hello@joshsteinrealtor.comPhone or WhatsApp · English / Español · Licensed in Florida since 2002

The Miami Confidential

The reporting, every two weeks.

Every new case file. Every delivery date that moves. Every figure dated and sourced. No listings, no hype, no press releases dressed up as news.

Free, every two weeks. Pick one or both. Unsubscribe in one click.
A–Z Buildings
Scroll to Top